|
Vulcan Lodge, Ancient Free-Masons, Birmingham, Alabama
|
| November 6, 2007 | Februrary 11, 2008 |
|
11/6/2007 9:26 PM|Vulcan Lodge Jamie Peffer Venerable Master David Cooksey Senior Warden Micheal Bridell Junior Deacon George Sawaya Senior Deacon Davied Rodriguez Senior Steward Alan Higginbotham Junior Steward David Kimbrell Tyler |
![]() |
Should you become involved with this group, you might want to ask about what happened to David C., Davied, Alan, and David K.? Claiming first 7 officers and yet 90 days later claiming only three would seem to indicate that 57% of their 'membership' figured out they'd been, to use a Masonic phrase, hoodwinked! Their 'surviving' members (or at least the NAMES of their surviving members) will who'll pop up on a blog comment section or in some unregulated forum bragging about how their group doesn't suffer the same 'problems' as regular/recognized Freemasonry. It's all in 'the tale of the tape', folks. Decide for yourself.
Curiously too, on a blog post of August 2, 2008 we found these events upcoming:
Lodge Ritual Practice
Entered Apprentice Degree TBA
Fellow Craft Lecture for Bro. George TBA
Dues-Dues-Dues
Lodge Elections September meeting
Jamie Peffer Venerable Master
This leads to further questions. Their 'lodge', according to Mr. Cooksey, during this period was composed of SEVEN members (and every one of them seems to be listed in November, 2007 as shown above). "Dues - Dues - Dues" seems to take an important role in their concerns. They were supposedly meeting in a public library, after all, so what was the issue about dues anyway when there are only seven (or perhaps THREE?) members? How much infrastructure do they need to support? Oh, and we do hope the the third ranking officer of the lodge does manage to become a 'full' member some day. Doesn't look like that's going to happen anytime soon as that 'to be announced' has been pending for all of 2008 so far - but EIGHT DAYS before a ONE YEAR LATER, there's a blog post telling folks to "Check back as we will be notifying candidates shortly of their degree schedules." Huh? Why do OTHERS need to check back? (Maybe we misunderstood and they want their 'invisible candidates' to check back. Hard to tell.) Will we find out who'll be taking what degrees when (or where)? Don't hold your breath....
On their blog of October 13, 2008 there was a
wonderful picture of --- what is that anyway? Is that THEIR LODGE? It had, after
all, the name "Vulcan" over it. The post, titled "Welcome"
would seem to imply that it's where they meet, wouldn't you think? Of course, if
you look closely you'll see that those emblems on the grate doors are that of
the Kiwanis and a bit of digging around the Vulcan Monument website that it's
really the Linn-Henly Gallery there. You can compare the (identical) doors at
this link. (*See next paragraph) Now the
Vulcanites will whine that they're being unduly persecuted
and that they'd NEVER intended to create the impression that this was THEIR
location but it does seem particularly strange that they didn't mention that in
their 'welcome', eh? Perhaps they would have been better putting a hand-drawn
napkin in the center of the table where the two or three of them meet at a
Starbucks or something.
Update 10/29/08: Comically, barely 24 hours after we posted the paragraph above, their proud proclamation about "...a true Masonic meaning and Brotherhood...." was changed. Gone was the misleading photo, replaced by an innocuous picture of the Vulcan statue. To us, this 'shuck and jive' once again showed what you're getting into if you chose to do so. If you think this is what Freemasonry and Brotherhood is all about, you are VERY sadly deluded! REAL Masonic Lodges don't do things like this, folks.
We read the breathless blog post at http://vulcanmasoniclodge.blogspot.com/2008/03/miracle-is-about-to-happen.html (which they've now predictably deleted). Here's a part of it, complete with the typographical errors and their penchant for runtogetherwords:
On Saturday April 19, 2008 history was made in Birmingham, Al. For the first time ever Black and White Masons met on the level and breeched the color line.Because the Alabama the Grand Lodge doesn't recognize Prince Hall.Venerable Master Jamie Peffer and Senior Warden David Cooksey of VulcanLodge attended lodge with the Brethren of the Sons of Light Lodge No.3.
But wait: it happened, apparently, all over again because a post on September 21, 2008 announced:
For the first time ever Black and White Masons met on the level and breached the color line.
Worshipful Master Ian Jackson personally invited all Vulcan Lodge members to attend their regular communication and Vulcan Lodge accepted.
The Sons of Light No. 3 is a Progressive Free & Accepted Mason lodge affiliated with PHA but not a member of PHA. All present had a wonderful time.
What a joy it was to be in lodge with brethren who are thirsty for Masonic knowledge! They have invited us back and we have, in turn, extended an invitation for them to take part in some of our upcoming activities.
Pictured is Jamie Peffer Venerable Master of Vulcan Lodge.
Astonishing, isn't it? Reading that second announcement you'd think it had occurred on the Saturday before - but not if you'd read the one they deleted about the meeting in April.... Gosh, you would think that these bright young men wouldn't be quite so deceitful but they certainly do wind up making themselves look like fools without any outside help. Oh, and we should mention that this truly momentous occasion (at least the first time) consisted of ONLY TWO Vulcanites. The others were apparently all too busy to be part of history - when it first occurred twice. Oh, well....
And we're glad they were excited to be with "...brethren who are thirsty for Masonic knowledge!" Does this mean that they've got no one like that in their Vulcan lodge? Or perhaps, since both organizations are simply playing make-believe, they want to learn about the 'real thing'?
Also, as we noted when we'd added their story to this site originally, "affiliated with PHA but not a member of PHA" is just more
'shuck and jive'. At the time, there were comments made to various Masonic discussion venues asserting that my remarks here were racist. Perhaps the individual making such charges would care to complain to the MWPHGL of Massachusetts where I've held membership in African Lodge #459 for more than a decade? (Talk is cheap, boys! You visited a meeting with black men. Wow! What a big deal. You obviously think this is a big deal. For some of us, living racial equality is just an everyday part of our lives and nothing noticeable or out of the ordinary.) And one would wonder why a Grand Lodge would make me their representative to a MWPHGL if, in fact, the charge of racism had even the slightest shred of truth. The Vulcanites want to make a big deal out of a visit with a couple of people from another race: bully for them. However, the regular MW Prince Hall Grand Lodge of Alabama would have nothing to do with EITHER the Vulcans OR the Sons of Light!Working on pages involving counterfeit Freemasonry (or, as these kiddies like to call it, "Free-Masonry") really and truly is hysterically funny.
In November, 2008, the Vulcanites - exhibiting what they apparently thought was 'Masonic behavior - chose to publish all sorts of personal information about me on their blog. It's something that one might expect from the anti-Masonic crowd but apparently those involved in this 'Vulcan Lodge' feel that such behavior is appropriate for them too. Sure, they feel badly that their little charade had been exposed to the light of day but is putting an individual's personal information (address, phone, etc.) on the web for all to search an appropriate reaction? What happens if YOU fall out of grace with them. Will they then throw flaming paper bags on your porch or something?
That's the way it is with counterfeits, though: they moan and groan when facts are presented but rather than address them forthrightly, they respond with personal attacks on the individual, complete with horrid spelling and bad syntax! Just watch them: you'll see.
A few days later they decided to provide the waiting world with a picture of what they described as their "elegant lodge" including pictures showing their officers. Of course, there were only two people in each of the pictures/posts. Could it be they only know how to upload one picture at a time? Or, more likely, were there only three people to photograph? The pictures were in an A-B, B-C, A-C fashion. Somebody, after all, had to hold the camera. Of course, the second picture has now been removed from their site but we've got a page capture snapshot if anyone wishes to see it.
Moreover,
though, we thought that the pictures of the officers really did look more like
they were standing in someone's front parlor than in a lodge room. Despite
the fancy guilt frame, the picture of
Oh, but then there was the other thing that caught our eye: take a close look in the far right of their picture. What is that on the lamp-table (of the kind that one finds in a house but not a lodge room)? Why it's a - hold on for this - TEA CUP!
Yes, indeed: a tea cup and saucer in a little display stand. Looks like a cute little jam jar or creamer there too.
Apparently the Chapter of Clermont ritual they use must have a tea cup and saucer as part of it. Do they get to hold the tea cup and put their pinkies in the air, practicing proper movement of cup to lip? Do they get a little minature to take home in remembrance of the wonderful night they became a "mason"? Who knows? Maybe this photo was taken the night they were having some bogus women's lodge over to visit but they made no mention of such a thing, then or subsequently. It must be nice, though, to have a tea cup on the ready 'just in case'....
In fact, it's more likely that this photo is in one of the boys' parents' living room and this lamp was just a bit difficult to move without getting yelled at. So, instead, it simply becomes part of their "elegant lodge" when they play dress-up. You really have to wonder about these guys....
![]()
As you read on the web about "Traditional Cosmopolitan Freemasonry" (or "Traditional Cosmopolitan Free-Masonry"), remember that this is an example of it! If you contribute money or time, you should plan that your efforts will be thrown into the dust bin of history within a few months and you should know that you'll NEVER be welcome in the world-wide fraternity of several millions of Masons. Enjoy!
http://vulcanmasoniclodge.blogspot.com (whoops! It's gone away.... and frankly, we don't have the time to keep up with their ever-changing blogging)
![]()
Wow! That sounds SO cool, doesn't it? Sounds like it would be something really worthwhile. In fact, though, it's a cobbled and confused history of stuff that everybody things they've got the 'real deal' of but which nobody can prove. The actual Rite of Clermont existed from ~1754 until ~1763. You can read all sorts of theories and suppositions about who did what when but nearly every Masonic researcher contradicts every other on the details of this - so it's highly unlikely that someone who has ZERO credentials in Masonic scholarship/research has found something that's correct. Beyond that, if these degrees were do darn good and meaningful, why aren't they in use today? Well, dear friends, it's because they WEREN'T - even though somebody may be massaging them in the back room so that you'll think so.
There's a long and difficult post here which fairly accurately summarizes the twists, turns, and theories of this particular Rite, one of hundreds that existed on the Continent at this time.
Just because the guy who started this group thinks this is a really great way to communicate the lessons of Freemasonry doesn't mean it really is. Sorry....
![]()
Above we mention the constantly changing blog sites (not to mention their aberrations like the 'total silence' shown above) but in their
fifth incarnation (May, 2009), they decided to go 'whole hog' in the field of deception. Publishing - as other 'counterfeit groups' do various essays from REAL Masons. Like all of the fakes and phonies, they post works published by (dead) regular/recognized Freemasons, ignoring copyright if applicable, and making it seem as if these people were somehow supportive of the Vulcan Lodge and/or its ideals. Nothing could be further from the truth and those men would certainly roll over in their graves if they could know how their labor of love is being bastardized.The essays will, perhaps, draw at least one or two curious eyes to their website du jour while simultaneously creating an aura of realism since the topics carefully chosen are controversial, at least at the outset. Like all houses built on sand, though, we suspect this too will collapse after a VERY short while (they've not been able to keep any of their four prior attempts going consistently for more than a couple of months) so there'll be some other bit of shuck and jive attempted in the not-too-distant future, we're sure.
Of course, there may be a simpler solution: the kiddies are just learning about technology and thus, their need to create (soon a half-dozen?) sites and then abandon them for something else. We know, in fact, that one of their 3-4 members, who claims to NOT be a member, hasn't a clue as to what the sound of a fax machine is when he reaches one on the telephone. He thinks - hold on for this one! - that it's someone blowing a whistle into the phone at him. AMAZING!! I sure wish I had lungs that could keep a whistle going for several minutes without a single fluctuation. Why he even posted about it on his blog in 2008.
UPDATE - and an update to it: A copy of their Webmaster's explanation as to their use of copyright material permission was forwarded to me: it's hysterical. Rev. Charles Edmonds writes "...our website was developed by a profession <sic> software developer(me). <sic>" I've never known a "Reverend software developer" that was simultaneously a web designer but the economy is tough and when Google can't find you connected to a church anywhere.... well, ..... (You could see a Google cache copy of this claim here but it looks like they had it removed. How convenient! One might conclude that the bright light from Masonicinfo.com has caused the discussion forum owner to remove the thread to a private location since it's no longer visible directly. Now it's too bad they won't remove my copyrighted blog posts as they've done for Chris Hodapp - but that's another page we'll be developing in the near future.)
But back to the matter at hand: as usual, you just can't believe what these fellows write. Writing it was "developed" would cause one to think that the design and implementation were all the work of that Reverend, wouldn't it? Naw.... In fact, it's a WordPress Template which you can find easily on the web and for several prices including FREE!!! (Here's an example so you can compare their site with site supposedly "designed" by him. It was, we observed, a design titled "Church" and there was a Google ad on that page when I went there for "Become a Pastor with an Online Pastoral Degree. Study Online, in your spare time." Hmmmm....
The web designer Reverend writes "...anyone can file a DMCA request....". I had mentioned before he'd written his reply that these were DEAD authors but perhaps his religious position permits him to know that the dead can file such things from their internet terminal on high if they really want to.
Even better was this: "Copyright laws as you should know has <sic> provisions for reproduction for the explicit purpose of discussion and debate( fell <sic> free to comment on our site at the end of any post Mr. Ed)." (I've always found it comical that these guys whine about not getting any the proper respect and then use these puerile insults like "Mr. Ed" or "Burger King". Speaks really highly of 'the Reverend' and his personal/religious values, doesn't it?
Perhaps this "Reverend", being so knowledgeable on copyright matters, will cite the particular part of copyright law where this is allowed?
And, this being the case, perhaps he'll want post several chapters of Dan Brown's new book up on their site for discussion, eh? After all, it would be "...for the explicit purpose of discussion and debate...." Rest assured we'll FEEL (not fell) free to comment more about this stupidity so you can truly enjoy their antics.
You may have also noticed also that in the thread a pseudonym asserts he is a 'regular' Mason writing "For the record, Mr. King, I became a mainstream Mason after I joined this site and while investigating and learning more about Masonry. Quite frankly, had I come across your site first, I might well have walked away from the notion altogether. Hate, sarcasm, and impiety have no place amid brother Masons, and I'm disheartened it's the path you've taken." He seems to have forgotten the obligatory 'Brother' and instead used 'Mr.' as if, somehow one of us is not a Mason. Should we guess which of the two of us it is?
Just a couple of hours later, the Vulcan immediate Past Venerable Master (I chuckle about that title, used to differentiate 'them' from 'us') writes "Loved ones? Yeah right. He is just a miserable, lonely, old b@stard."
It's typical: do as I say, don't do as I do - a behavior they've honed to a fine edge. They, and you dear reader, can be assured that our life is full and rich, without the need to run from pillar to post on the internet, hiding behind lots of secret identities to whine and cry about how very awful Ed and his site are. And don't worry: I'm not at ALL in ANY trouble with ANY REAL Grand Lodge despite blowhard claims. It's absolutely hysterical to even contemplate such a thing!
Rest assured, there'll be more foolishness and we'll be right here to report their obfuscation attempts in sordid detail.
![]()
For those who are following the section below to watch for changes...
![]()
On this page during 2007 and 2008, we'd told you about Mr. David Cooksey, the once proud Grand Secretary of the United Grand Lodge of America and his status as the 'Former' Grand Secretary a scant seven months later. We had also written about his creation of the so-called Temple of Regulus and the Rite of Claremont, both of which seemed to morph into a new entity called Vulcan Lodge as his Grand Secretary-ship ended. In late 2008 the Vulcans - all 3-4 of them - distanced themselves from him as well but we now (May, 2009) find that he's back with them. We detailed his attempts to derail a U.S. gubernatorial election, his character assassination of members of the Grand Lodge of Alabama and the Scottish Rite Bodies there. And we also had written about a supposed death threat he'd received ostensibly arising from things he had written online about regular, recognized Freemasonry. (No proof of same was ever forthcoming incidentally.)
Mr. Cooksey, in response, has taken great umbrage with the things written here. (See further note below!) He's railed in many online venues that we were lying yet he's never substantively addressed ANY of it. Following our site revisions on July 30 and August 1, 2008, this was posted on one his blogs (now removed) on the morning of August 2, 2008.

Perhaps Mr. Cooksey believes that a 'confrontation' accomplished via a trip of some 1,500 miles will scare us into changing our mind about the foolish antics of those who're so heavily involved in fake/sham Masonry. Perhaps he thinks that threats like this will immediately bring support his cause. Who knows?
Based on what we've observed of Mr. Cooksey's erratic behavior and his obvious intent to escalate, perhaps with violence, we've decided to let him make an ass of himself on his own time and not waste any more of ours on him.
Do remember, folks: the person who wrote that message is (was?) the Senior Warden of a lodge which is part of the 'cosmopolitan' and 'modern' Grand Orient of the United States. While some may not find what these fellows have described as the "crumbling little kingdom" of regular/recognized Freemasonry to be of their liking, is theirs really a better alternative?
When we say we've been threatened, folks, we put the evidence right out here in public view....
Perhaps you've come here to read about how Mr. Cooksey's mother was supposedly insulted by Ed King. In fact, no such thing occurred. Mr. Cooksey, yet again, wants to play the victim.
In my August 1, 2008 update, under a comical graphic of a baby crying and the header "Mommy, Mommy...." I commented about GOOFUS members as follows: "They regularly write e-mails to Grand Masters of various Grand Lodges bemoaning how they've been mischaracterized on this website, sometimes using family situations (real or fantasy) to appeal to the soft-hearted nature of Masonic leadership whom they've regularly accused of being lying, cheating, spineless patsies." Mr. Cooksey has, in fact, done this very thing. I then added an intemperate comment that these whiners also sometimes use family illnesses to bolster their position.
My comment was NEVER meant as any kind of insult to Mr. Cooksey's mother nor was it worded in a way that any reasonable person could ever make that connection. Mr. Cooksey, however, choose to use his bizarre interpretation and repeat it in several places on the web.
THE FACTS: the offending paragraph was IMMEDIATELY removed and replaced with an apology - within 24 hours of its initial appearance and within five minutes of my seeing his several blog posts, each more incendiary. In addition, I posted an apology directly on Mr. Cooksey's blog. First he wrote that an apology was not good enough, then he mused that someone else posted that apology in my name (using my Blogger account!!), then he closed his blog to comments so he would not have to address incontrovertible proof that it WAS my apology, then he removed the post to which I had attached the apology, then he posted several threats (one of which is shown above), and then he closed down his blog.
He now continues to mischaracterize the incident at, seemingly, every opportunity. it is only because of Mr. Cooksey's continued mischaracterizations that we have included this addendum.
Mr. Cooksey misinterpreted
and continues to misinterpret -
deliberately - what was written.
Despite HIS misunderstanding, I once again apologize.
IMPORTANT NOTICEThe use of the word 'mother' anywhere on this website except in the section immediately above (from the words "The Cooksey Saga" to here) has NO CONNECTION to Mr. Cooksey or his family in any way, either expressed or implied. Mr. Cooksey, obsessively seeking attention, takes every opportunity to mischaracterize my writings. |
![]()
Updated
May 31,
2008, July 28, 2008 and August 1, 2008
Completely revised August 2, 2008 and updated August 25, 2008,
October 17, 2008, October 29, 2008, January 29, 2009,
February 11, 2009, May 25, 2009,
July 8, 2009, and July 15, 2009.
|
Related Topics: |
|
In addition, |
|
This site and its contents are © (copyright) 1998-2010 by Edward L. King (Ed King). All rights reserved. All comments and opinions are mine personally. Got some thoughts or reactions?
We'd be interested in your comments - within reason of
course.
|